Sigma Photography

Sigma 600mm f/8 Mirror Telephoto Lens



Has anyone had any experience with this lens or know of anyone that uses it? I am assuming it is based on the same principle as a cassegrain telescope in which case I would expect very sharp image results. I have been searching the web for image examples but have not been successfull.

I am debating on this lens, which goes for around $300 and then possible a good macro lens in the $300 range or one Sigma 50-500 lens that cost around $700.

Any help appreciated.


Can't speak for this lens in particular. In general Mirror lenses are compact and provide sharp images BUT
1/As you have seen, maximum aperture is not usually large: f8 is fairly common. Minimum aperture may not be too far away from this: to allow some degree of exposure control, some make it easy to insert neutral density filters instead of stopping down. You REQUIRE an exposure of 1/600 second or less if handheld, and even with a tripod you probably want a fairly short shutter speed, which won't mix too well with a maximum aperture of f8.
2/Out of focus light sources appear as characteristic doughnut-shaped highlights, which can be distracting. Sometimes you will see this used as a special effect.

(Hence when you see sports photographers etc. they don't use mirror lenses, but monster telephotos that cost about 10 times as much).


quote:
Originally posted by mcdowella
Can't speak for this lens in particular. In general Mirror lenses are compact and provide sharp images BUT
1/As you have seen, maximum aperture is not usually large: f8 is fairly common. Minimum aperture may not be too far away from this: to allow some degree of exposure control, some make it easy to insert neutral density filters instead of stopping down. You REQUIRE an exposure of 1/600 second or less if handheld, and even with a tripod you probably want a fairly short shutter speed, which won't mix too well with a maximum aperture of f8.
2/Out of focus light sources appear as characteristic doughnut-shaped highlights, which can be distracting. Sometimes you will see this used as a special effect.

(Hence when you see sports photographers etc. they don't use mirror lenses, but monster telephotos that cost about 10 times as much).



Thanks for the reply. Im not too concerned with the f8 or the light source effect. I used an ETX-90, which was 1250mm and I believe
somewhere around 10 aperture or more. I got what I feel were excellent results with the meade etx-90 and that was with the camera looking through an eyepiece. I would think that the mirror lens would give the same, if not better results. Am I wrong in assuming that?


Click here to read entire thread and the replies to this message!

Back to Home Page!